On 12 February 2015,
ISIL forces took the town of Khan al-Baghdadi, 100 miles west of Baghdad and 5
miles from the Ayn al-Asad Airbase in Anbar Province, Iraq. This morning, 13 February 2015, the airbase
was attacked by 20-25 ISIL fighters reportedly wearing Iraqi uniforms and some wearing
suicide-belts. They were engaged by
Iraqi Security Forces – three detonated their suicide-belts and five were shot
dead.
The airbase was
captured in 2003 during Operation Iraqi Freedom and became the largest
Coalition base in western Iraq and the second largest US airbase. The base was officially closed on 31 December
2011. US forces moved back to the airbase
late last year to train the Iraqi Security Forces.
The airbase has come
under attack on a number of occasions since December 2014 but, as the debate
takes place in the US concerning the passage of an Authorization of Military
Force (AUMF) against ISIL, the attack, that had no hope of causing any serious
damage, could be sending a number of messages:
1. Refuting President
Obama’s claim that airpower and the training of Iraqi forces has halted the
ISIL advance.
2. Drawing US forces into combat.
3. A deterrence to Jordan – the airbase is the largest military installation in Anbar Province that borders with Jordan.
2. Drawing US forces into combat.
3. A deterrence to Jordan – the airbase is the largest military installation in Anbar Province that borders with Jordan.
4. Showing that US
trainers are vulnerable – thus disrupting a major part of current US strategy.
5. Deterring other nations that be consider sending military training teams.
6. A boost to ISIL morale after recent territorial setbacks, such as Kobane.
7. A recruitment drive by showing that they are directly confronting the US.
8. A change of tactic against foreigners in Iraq to offset the lack of hostages for publicity purposes.
5. Deterring other nations that be consider sending military training teams.
6. A boost to ISIL morale after recent territorial setbacks, such as Kobane.
7. A recruitment drive by showing that they are directly confronting the US.
8. A change of tactic against foreigners in Iraq to offset the lack of hostages for publicity purposes.
As the AUMF is debated,
ISIL Strategic Communication messaging may dictate tactical engagements.
No comments:
Post a Comment